Search
+
    SEARCHED FOR:

    BANGALORE TAX TRIBUNAL

    Some tax clarity for non-profits

    A tax officer has the power to call for any documents/information of the entity to conduct an inquiry 'as he thinks necessary to satisfy himself about the occurrence of a 'specified violation'', and pass an order to cancel the registration of such entity, even for previous years (and all subsequent years after that), in cases where the officer notices any 'specified violations', or if a case is selected by 'risk management strategy' formulated by CBDT.

    Toyota Kirloskar gets ITAT relief over royalty payments

    The appellate body approved the company's royalty payment of ₹646 crore at 6% of local value addition and rejected the transfer pricing officer's estimate of ₹437 crore at 2.62% of net sales.

    SC slams IT department for filing cases after time limit

    The Supreme Court criticized the income-tax department for filing petitions belatedly, highlighting a delay of over four years in an appeal against Bharti Airtel Ltd. The court urged the department to establish a proper litigation policy, noting its status as the "biggest litigant" in India. Rejecting the appeal, the court cited the department's tendency to reopen cases after sporadic successes, emphasizing the need for more judicious litigation practices.

    Flipkart gets Rs 1,700 crore relief from the Bengaluru bench of tax tribunal

    ​​The ITAT followed a ruling by the Karnataka High Court with regard to a similar case involving pharmaceutical company Biocon as well as ruling in a case involving Novo Nordisk.

    Taxman disallows Rs 4.5L TDS, irks ITAT

    A majority of taxpayers invariably incur TDS against their income — be it against salary, professional income or interest income. To carry on with this illustration, it is the employer organisation, the client and the bank which are respectively responsible for deducting tax at source and depositing it with the government.

    IPL promotions: Anil Kumble exempt from service tax

    The Bangalore bench of CESTAT held that the promotional activities provided by Kumble during the IPL shall not be treated as "business auxiliary services" and therefore, no service tax can be imposed on the same. The CESTAT set aside the department's ₹50 lakh service tax claim.

    The Economic Times
    BACK TO TOP