Next Article in Journal
An Efficient Autonomous Exploration Framework for Unmanned Surface Vehicles in Unknown Waters
Previous Article in Journal
Geometric Evaluation of the Hydro-Pneumatic Chamber of an Oscillating Water Column Wave Energy Converter Employing an Axisymmetric Computational Model Submitted to a Realistic Sea State Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov. and Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. (Nematoda, Desmodoridae) from Mangrove Wetlands of China

College of Life Sciences, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252059, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12(9), 1621; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12091621
Submission received: 11 August 2024 / Revised: 6 September 2024 / Accepted: 9 September 2024 / Published: 11 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Marine Ecology)

Abstract

:
Two new species of free-living marine nematodes, Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov. and Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov., from mangrove wetlands of Beihai, Guangxi province in China, are described. Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov. is characterized by eight longitudinal rows of somatic setae arranged from the posterior part of the body, loop-shaped amphidial foveae with an open top and double contours, pharynx with bipartite cuticularized internal cavity, spicules with well-developed capitulum, gubernaculum canoe-shaped, without apophysis, 6–8 precloacal tubular supplements, and a short, conical tail with two ventral protuberances. It could be easily distinguished from the known species by spicule length and numbers of precloacal supplements. Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. is characterized by short cephalic setae, relatively small amphidial fovea, slender spicules ventrally bent with pronounced hooked capitulum and tapered distal end, two poriform precloacal supplements, and a relatively long conico-cylindrical tail. It differs from other species by the shape of spicules and long tail. Nearly full-length SSU sequences (1542–1592 bp) of the two species were provided, and phylogenetic trees based on maximum likelihood analyses supported the taxonomic position of the two new species. The combined use of traditional morphology-based taxonomy and molecular approaches has been proven to be a good choice for identification of free-living nematodes.

1. Introducción

The mangrove is one of the most productive ecosystems in the world and plays an important role in the maintenance of coastal biodiversity. Mangrove sediments harbor numerous marine nematodes, which participate in nutrient cycling and affect carbon fixation in mangrove wetlands [1]. Furthermore, nematodes are sensitive to the physicochemical conditions of the sediment, being potential bioindicators for conservation purposes [2]. The identification of nematode species would improve our understanding of ecosystems’ functional roles [3]. In the past few years, the community structure of nematodes was investigated, and some nematode species were also found and described in the mangrove wetlands of China [4,5,6].
The family Desmodoridae belongs to the superfamily Desmodoroidea Filipjev, 1922, and it is composed of six subfamilies: Desmodorinae Micoletzky, 1924, Molgolaiminae Jensen, 1978, Prodesmodorinae Lorenzen, 1981, Pseudonchinae Gerlach & Riemann, 1973, Spiriniinae Gerlach & Murphy, 1965, and Stilbonematinae Chitwood, 1936 [7].
The genus Metachromadora Filipjev, 1918, belongs to the subfamily Spiriniinae Gerlach & Murphy, 1965. Metachromadora is a heterogeneous genus and not well defined [8]. It has been reviewed by Gerlach (1951), Wieser & Hopper (1967), Gerlach & Riemann (1972), Lorenzen (1981), and Maria (2013) [9,10]. It was first divided into five subgenera: Bradylaimus, Chromadoropsis, Metonyx, Metachromadora, and Neonyx by Gerlach (1951) [11]. Subsequently, Timm (1961) erected the sixth subgenus, Metachromadoroides, with species M. vulgaris and M. complexa [12]. Later, Chromadoropsis was reinstated to the genus level by Furstenberg & Vincx in 1988 [13]. Until now, Metachromadora consists of five subgenera and is still a large genus, containing 32 valid species. Metachromadora is a very widely distributed genus. It is found in marine habitats such as mangrove wetlands, sublittoral areas, coral reefs, estuaries, and the continental shelf, from muddy to sandy sediments.
The genus Molgolaimus Ditlevsen, 1921, belongs to the subfamily Molgolaiminae Jensen, 1978. The taxonomic status of Molgolaimus is complicated and has been amended several times. Molgolaimus was first placed in the family Microlaimidae by Gerlach and Riemann in 1973 [14]. The family Microlaimidae is characterized by two outstretched ovaries and two opposed testes or only anterior testis. Subsequently, Jensen (1978) erected the family Molgolaimidae based on female and male reproductive systems (a single anterior testis in males and two reflexed ovaries in females) [15]. Then, Lorenzen (1994) downgraded the family Molgolaimidae as a subfamily Molgolaiminae in Desmodoridae Filipjev, 1922 [16]. It was divided into four species groups by Fonseca et al. [17] based on spicule length, and scatter-plot graphs of morphometric data and illustrations of the different 33 Molgolaimus species were provided in the study. Furthermore, Molgolaimus haakonmosbiensis Portnova, 2009 [18], Molgolaimus kaikouraensis Leduc, Fu & Zhao, 2019 [19], and Molgolaimus euryformis Zhou, Zeng, Cai, Fu & Tan, 2020 [6] were described. Additionally, two Microlaimus species were transferred to the genus by Shi and Xu [20]. Molgolaimus now contains 38 valid species. Molgolaimus is a common free-living marine nematode genus from shallow waters to the deep sea, and it is also found in the mangrove forests. The genus often occurs in organically enriched and recently colonized sediments.
The choice of molecular markers in nematode barcoding studies was controversial. COI, 18S, and 28S nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) have been suggested as ideal gene markers to discriminate marine nematodes [21,22]. Some scientists proposed the comprehensive use of different genes would obtain better results. 18S rRNA sequences contain both conserved and variable regions, suitable for primer design and taxonomic distinction. Therefore, the 18S rRNA sequence was a potential useful marker for the rapid molecular identification of nematodes. Desmodoridae is complicated due to a lack of synapomorphy, and it is also paraphyletic based upon small subunit of ribosomal DNA [23]. So in this study, we described two new species, one belonging to the genus Metachromadora and another to Molgolaimus, based on combined morphological and molecular approaches. Nearly full-length SSU sequences of the two species were obtained for phylogenetic analysis. This study will help to improve the assessment of marine nematode diversity and their evolutionary relationships.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling and Morphological Analysis

Sediments were obtained from mangrove wetland located in Tieshan Harbor of Beihai, Guangxi province (109°36′ E, 21°36′ N) in October 2023. During the sampling process, four transects (A, B, C, and D) were established, and both of the new species were discovered at transect C. Mangrove plants Avicennia marina were distributed across transects A, B, and C, and Rhizophora stylosa was the dominant mangrove species at transect D. Samples were collected by pushing a syringe (2.6 cm internal diameter) into the sediment to a depth of 5 cm. Samples used for molecular analysis were stored in 95% ethanol and frozen at −20 °C. The sediments for morphological analysis were then fixed in 5% formalin and washed through two sieves with mesh sizes of 500 and 42 µm to separate meiofauna from macrofauna. Ludox™ with a gravity of 1.15 was used for separating fauna from sediment. Nematodes were observed using a stereoscopic microscope and transferred into a mixture of 5% glycerol, 5% pure ethanol, and 90% freshwater. After evaporation of ethanol, specimens were mounted on slides. The nematodes were identified using a differential interference contrast microscope (Leica DM 2500) (CMS GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany, assembled in Shanghai, China). The microphotographs were taken with a camera, a Leica DMC 5400. The nematodes’ line drawings were made with the aid of a camera lucida (Leica, 10×). All measurements were taken using Leica LAS X version 3.3.3, and all curved structures were measured along the arc or median line.
Abbreviations used in the table are as follows: a = body length divided by body maximum width, b = body length divided by the pharynx length, c = body length divided by the tail length, c’ = tail length divided by the anal body diameter, c.b.d. = corresponding body diameter, V% = distance from the vulva from the anterior end divided by the total body length [24].

2.2. Molecular Analysis

Specimens were rinsed with phosphate buffer three times to remove ethanol. Subsequently, nematodes were cut into several pieces with a sterile scalpel, transferred into Eppendorf tubes, and DNA was extracted from nematodes following the protocol of the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). PCR was performed using an Ex taq polymerase kit (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan). Nearly full-length of the 18S rDNA was amplified using 18S-G18S4 (5′-GCTTGTCTCAAAGATTAAGCC-3′) and 18S-18P (5′-TGATCCWKCYGCAGGTTCAC-3′) [25]. Each PCR mixture (50 μL) contained 5 µL DNA template, 200 μmol/L of each dNTP, 1.5 μmol/L MgCl2, 0.3 μmol/L of each primer, 2.5 U of Ex Taq DNA polymerase, and 5 µL of 10× reaction buffer. The PCR program was as follows: denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; 38 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 56 °C for 1min and 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s; and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. After verification in a 1% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide, PCR products were purified. Sequencing was carried out in both directions with the ABI 3730XL DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA, USA) by Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All sequences were deposited in GenBank. A total of 23 18S rDNA sequences, belonging to the family Desmodoridae and Microlaimidae, were downloaded from the GenBank database. The sequences were subsequently edited and aligned using the program Geneious v. 9.0.2 (Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand), Maximum likelihood bootstrapping analysis was performed with RAxML HPC v. 8, using the locus-specific model partitions with the default parameters and the GTRGAMMA model as implemented on the CIPRES, NSF XSEDE resource with bootstrap statistics calculated from 1000 bootstrap replicates [26]. Diplopeltis cirrhatus was selected as the outgroup.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Description of Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov.

Class Chromadorea Inglis, 1983
Subclass Chromadoria Pearse, 1942
Order Desmodorida De Coninck, 1965
Superfamily Desmodoroidea Filipjev, 1922
Family Desmodoridae Filipjev, 1922
Subfamily Spiriniinae Gerlach & Murpy, 1965
Genus Metachromadora Filipjev, 1918
Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov.

3.1.1. Type Material

Four males and two females were measured and studied. Holotype: ♂1 on slide C3-1-5. Paratypes: ♂2 on slide C3-1-5, ♂3 and ♂4 on slide C3-1-15, ♀1 on slide C3-1-7, and ♀2 on slide C3-1-8. The type material is deposited in the Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

3.1.2. Type Locality and Habitat

Muddy surface sediment (0–5 cm) in mangrove wetland, located in Tieshan Harbor in Beihai, Guangxi province (109°36′ E, 21°36′ N).

3.1.3. Etymology

The species epithet comes from the species name Metachromadora obscura Nguyen Dinh Tu, Gagarin, Phan Ke Long, Nguyen Thi Xuan Phuong & Nguyen Vu Thanh, 2016, referring to the new species is similar to Metachromadora obscura in most morphological characteristics.

3.1.4. Measurements

All measurement data are provided in Table 1.

3.1.5. Description of Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov. (Figure 1 and Figure 2)

Males: Body cylindrical, 896–1020 µm long. Cuticle with fine striation starting immediately after the amphidial foveae. Lateral ridges, 2–3 µm wide (~1/30 of the body diameter at mid-body), beginning at the anterior end of the pharynx bulb and extending as far as the middle of the tail (Figure 2B). Blunt conical head. Six internal and six external labial sensilla prominent papilliform. Four cephalic setae 5–6 µm long (Figure 1A,C). No cervical setae. Somatic setae are short and stout, arranged in eight longitudinal rows from the posterior part of the body (two rows at each lateral side, two rows subventral, and two rows subdorsal). Amphideal fovea are loop-shaped with an open top and have double contours, positioned anterior to the first head cuticular annulus. Width of amphidial foveae 13–15 µm, about 50.0–62.5% of corresponding body diameter (Figure 1D and Figure 2D). Buccal cavity 33–38 μm deep, with three teeth, a large dorsal tooth, and two minute subventral teeth, the dorsal tooth is bigger (Figure 2C). Bulb length 39–43% of the total pharynx length, with bipartite cuticularized internal cavity (Figure 2A). Cardia muscular, small. Nerve ring anterior to the pharynx bulb. Secretory–excretory pore not observed.
Reproductive system monorchic with outstretched testis. Vas deferens at the right side of the intestine. Paired spicules (63–68 µm), equal, slender, ventrally curved, with an enlarged capitulum. Gubernaculum (30–31 µm) canoe-shaped, parallel to spicule, without apophyses (Figure 1F and Figure 2F). Six tubular precloacal supplements, about 11–17 µm apart, first supplement 5–6 µm anterior to the cloaca. Tail conical (1.7–2.0 times cloacal body diameter) with spinneret (7–8 µm). Terminal part of tail smooth, 8–10 µm long, 10–14% of total tail length. Two protuberances positioned on the ventral side of the tail, the first one 38–44 µm posterior to the cloaca. Caudal glands are present but poorly visible (Figure 1E and Figure 2E).
Females: Similar to males in general morphology. Few and scattered somatic setae. Reproductive system amphidelphic with two ovaries opposed and reflexed, anterior ovary positioned to the left of the intestine, posterior ovary to the right of the intestine. Vagina is very sclerotized. Two glands present. Vulva in the shape of transversal slit, located posterior to mid-body (56–59% of total length), occupying about five annules. Sperm cells are always found within the uterus. Tail without protuberance and setae (Figure 1B).

3.1.6. Differential Diagnosis and Discussion

Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov. is characterized by eight longitudinal rows of somatic setae arranged from the posterior part of the body, loop-shaped amphidial fovea with an open top and double contours, pharynx with bipartite cuticularized internal cavity, spicules with well-developed capitulum, gubernaculum canoe-shaped, without apophysis, 6–8 precloacal tubular supplements, and a short, conical tail with two ventral protuberances.
All the morphological features of the new species are consistent with the description of the subgenus Metachromadoroides. There are nine valid species within Metachromadoroides Timm, 1961: M. complexa, M. pulvinata, M. remanei, M. vulgaris, M. zaixsi, M. minor, and M. orientalis, M. obscura, and M. xiamenensis. Diagnosis of Subgenus Metachromadoroides Timm, 1961 (modified from Timm 1961) is as follows: cuticle heavily annulated, without longitudinal striation on head; lateral ridges present; stoma cylindrical, with dorsal tooth; smaller subventral teeth present or absent; amphidial foveae circular or loopshaped, having double contour; esophageal bulb with two or three internal divisions; precloacal supplemental in the shape of short, faintly cuticularized tubules or absent [12]. Metachromadoroides could be subdivided into two groups based on the precloacal supplements. Group 1, supplements absent: M. zaixsi, M. orientalis, and M. vulgaris. These three species could be easily differentiated by internal division of pharyngeal bulb (bipartite in M. orientalis vs. tripartite in M. zaixsi and M. vulgaris) and length of anterior non-striated part (one amphidial fovea length in M. zaixsi vs. two in M. vulgaris), respectively. Group 2, supplements present: M. complexa, M. xiamenensis, and M. minor have unique characteristics separately (setae absent, three small protuberances on the ventral side of the tail, and a short slim body); M. pulvinata, M. remanei, and M. obscura differed from each other by body length and numbers of precloacal supplements (1720 µm and 23 vs. 1100–1300 µm and 5 vs. 786 µm and 13–14).
Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov. closely resembles M. remanei in De Man ratios. New species could be distinguished from it by body length (896–1020 µm vs. 1100–1300 µm in M. remanei), spicule length (63–68 µm vs. 49–55 µm in M. remanei), and number of precloacal supplements (6–8 vs. 5 in M. remanei) [11]. Otherwise, the new species is morphologically similar to M. obscura. But differs from it by relatively shorter and thinner tail (c = 11.5–14.8, c’ = 1.7–2.0 vs. c = 10.7–12.1, c’ = 1.4–1.6 in M. obscura), amphid diameter as a percentage of the corresponding body diameter (50–62.5% vs. 65–75% in M. obscura), shorter spicules (63–68 µm vs. 75–78 µm in M. obscura), shorter gubernaculum (30–31 µm vs. 38–40 µm in M. obscura), smaller number of precloacal supplements (6–8 vs. 13–14 tubular supplements in M. obscura) [27].
Only one species of the genus, Metachromadora xiamenensis, has been previously described in China. It is also from the mangrove habitats. 18 tubular precloacal supplements and a tail with three small protuberances make it different from the new species [6]. Morphological differentiating characteristics of the species of Metachromadoroides are proposed (Table 2).

3.2. Description of Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov.

Class Chromadorea Inglis, 1983
Subclass Chromadoria Pearse, 1942
Order Desmodorida De Coninck, 1965
Superfamily Desmodoroidea Filipjev, 1922
Family Desmodoridae Filipjev, 1922
Subfamily Molgolaiminae Jensen, 1978
Genus Molgolaimus Ditlevsen, 1921
Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov.

3.2.1. Type Material

Four males and three females were measured and studied. Holotype: ♂1 on slide C3-1-49. Paratypes: ♂2 on slide C3-1-48, ♂3 on slide C3-1-50, ♂4 on slide C3-1-51, ♀1 on slide C3-1-47, ♀2 on slide C3-1-49, and ♀3 on slide C3-1-50. The type material is deposited in the Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

3.2.2. Type Locality and Habitat

Muddy surface sediment (0–5 cm) in mangrove wetland, located in Tieshan Harbor in Beihai, Guangxi province (109°36′ E, 21°36′ N).

3.2.3. Etymology

The species name is composed of the Latin adjectives longus and caudatus, referring to the new species with a relatively long tail.

3.2.4. Measurements

All measurement data are given in Table 3.

3.2.5. Description of Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5)

Males: Body slender and cylindrical, tapering gradually towards both ends (Figure 3E). Cuticle annules indistinct. Head separated from body by a faint constriction. Inner labial and outer labial sensilla not observed. Four cephalic setae 2 μm long, located posterior to cephalic constriction (Figure 3C and Figure 4B). Amphideal fovea round, posterior to the cephalic constriction, 3–4 µm in diameter, corresponding to 33.3–44.4% of corresponding diameter, about 6–7 µm from the anterior end (Figure 3C and Figure 4A). Buccal cavity small, weakly sclerotized, narrow, and with small teeth (Figure 3C). Pharynx corpus narrow cylindrical, ending in a pronounced spherical muscular bulb (17–19 µm diameter), and the bulb heavily cuticularized (Figure 3A and Figure 4A). Nerve ring located slightly anterior to middle of pharynx length. Excretory pore not observed. Cardia cylindrical, 6–9 μm long.
Reproductive system monorchic, with a single anterior outstretched testis, left to the intestine. Vas deferens long and thin. Spicules slender, 32–35 µm long (1.8–1.9 abd), ventrally bent with hooked capitulum and tapered distal end (Figure 4D). Gubernaculum arcuate and parallel to the spicules, without apophyses, its length corresponding to one third of the spicule length (Figure 3F). Two small precloacal supplements, poriform, 25–41 µm and 43–68 µm distant from the cloaca, respectively (Figure 3B and Figure 4C). Tail conico-cylindrical, conical in the proximal half, and distally characterized by a cylindrical prolongation (Figure 5A). Caudal glands not observed.
Females: Similar to males, but with a larger maximum body diameter and a shorter tail. Reproductive system didelphic with reflexed ovaries, the anterior branch right to the intestine and posterior branch to the left (Figure 5B). Vulva located anterior to mid-body (42.7–44.1% of total length) (Figure 3D).
Figure 3. Line drawing of Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. (A) Pharyngeal region of holotype, showing amphid, nerve ring, and pharyngeal bulb; (B) lateral view of holotype posterior end, showing spicule, gubernaculum, and precloacal supplements; (C) lateral view of holotype anterior end, showing cephalic setae, buccal cavity with a dorsal tooth, and amphidial fovea; (D) entire view of female; (E) entire view of male; (F) magnifying spicule and gubernaculum. Scale bar: (AC,F) = 10 μm; (D,E) = 30 μm.
Figure 3. Line drawing of Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. (A) Pharyngeal region of holotype, showing amphid, nerve ring, and pharyngeal bulb; (B) lateral view of holotype posterior end, showing spicule, gubernaculum, and precloacal supplements; (C) lateral view of holotype anterior end, showing cephalic setae, buccal cavity with a dorsal tooth, and amphidial fovea; (D) entire view of female; (E) entire view of male; (F) magnifying spicule and gubernaculum. Scale bar: (AC,F) = 10 μm; (D,E) = 30 μm.
Jmse 12 01621 g003
Figure 4. Microphotograph of Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. (A) Pharyngeal region of holotype, showing amphid (arrow) and pharyngeal bulb; (B) lateral view of holotype anterior end, showing cephalic setae (arrow) and buccal cavity; (C) lateral view of holotype cloacal region, showing spicule, gubernaculum, and precloacal supplements (arrows); (D) lateral view of holotype cloacal region, showing spicule. Scale bar: (AD) = 10 μm.
Figure 4. Microphotograph of Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. (A) Pharyngeal region of holotype, showing amphid (arrow) and pharyngeal bulb; (B) lateral view of holotype anterior end, showing cephalic setae (arrow) and buccal cavity; (C) lateral view of holotype cloacal region, showing spicule, gubernaculum, and precloacal supplements (arrows); (D) lateral view of holotype cloacal region, showing spicule. Scale bar: (AD) = 10 μm.
Jmse 12 01621 g004
Figure 5. Microphotograph of Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. (A) Tail of male and arrow showing cloacal; (B) Middle of female, showing egg (arrow 1), vulva (arrow 2), and ovary (arrow 3). Scale bar: (A) = 10 μm; (B) = 20 μm.
Figure 5. Microphotograph of Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. (A) Tail of male and arrow showing cloacal; (B) Middle of female, showing egg (arrow 1), vulva (arrow 2), and ovary (arrow 3). Scale bar: (A) = 10 μm; (B) = 20 μm.
Jmse 12 01621 g005

3.2.6. Differential Diagnosis and Discussion

Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. is characterized by short cephalic setae (2 μm), relative small amphidial fovea (3–4 μm in diameter), ventrally bent spicules with pronounced hooked capitulum, two poriform precloacal supplements, and a long conico-cylindrical tail (115–138 μm). Female reproductive system didelphic with two reflexed ovaries.
The genus Molgolaimus is characterized by round amphidial fovea, pharynx with a pronounced spherical bulb, and spicules of variable length and shape. Fonseca et al. (2006) provided an illustrated polytomous identification key to 33 species of the genus, which were classified into four groups according to absolute spicule length. This new species is placed in group 1b1, which is characterized by short spicules (<35 μm) and ratio spicules divided by the anal body diameter ranging from 1 to 3 [17]. There are seven species in the group: M. drakus, M. exceptionregulum, M. gazii, M. pecticauda, M. mareprofundus, M. sapiens, and M. spirifer. Molgolaimus in this group could be subdivided into three subgroups based on the number of precloacal supplements. Subgroup 1, supplements absent: M. pecticauda, M. spirifer and M. sapiens. M. pecticauda and M. spirifer could be easily differentiated clearly from other species of the group by their amphids (amphids with a tubiform structure in M. pecticauda and multispiral amphid fovea in M. spirifer, vs. unispiral or circular in other species of the group). M. sapiens differs in spicule with S-shaped blade. Subgroup 2, one supplement: M. drakusthe, M. mareprofundus, and M. exceptionregulum. M. drakusthe is characterized by a slim body, the shortest spicules, and amphidial fovea at 3 hd from the anterior end. M. mareprofundus resembles M. exceptionregulum but differs from it by the smaller body and slender spicules. Subgroup 3, two supplements: M. gazii is shorter and characterized by sexual dimorphism amphids. Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. can be distinguished by the longest tail (130–138 μm) and the spicules shape (pronounced hamose curved proximal terminus). Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. is morphologically close to M. exceptionregulum and M. mareprofundus but differs from them by the larger body length (735–793 µm vs. 500–605 μm and 610–630 μm), longer tail (c = 5.4–6.9 vs. c = 7.0–8.9, c = 7.2–7.6), and the presence of two precloacal supplements (one in M. exceptionregulum and M. mareprofundus) [17].
So far, Molgolaimus euryformis is the only species of this genus that has been discovered in mangrove wetlands in China. It belongs to group 1a in the identification key and is characterized by morphological characteristics of spicules (short with ventral apophysis) and gubernaculum (with a block-shaped hook on the terminus) [6]. It could be easily distinguished from the new species. The morphological differentiating characteristics of the Molgolaimus species of group1b1 (based on the classification of Fonseca et al. [17]) were provided (Table 4).

3.3. Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis

In this study, nearly full-length SSU sequences (1542–1592 bp) of the two new species were provided. All sequences were deposited in GenBank, and the accession numbers were PP923590 and PP923591 (Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov.), PP923592 and PP923593 (Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov.). Sequence alignment indicated that the amplified 18S rRNA fragments contained some variable regions, and it was suitable for DNA barcoding studies of Desmodoridae. Then, a taxonomic phylogenetic tree was constructed based on maximum likelihood analyses. The new species, Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov., formed a separate clade and was represented by a bootstrap support of 100%. The other species of Desmodoridae comprised another well-supported clade (bootstrap support of 100%). Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov. in this clade formed high-support clade clustering with other Metachromadora species (bootstrap = 98%). Five sequences of the genus Metachromadora were included in the phylogenetic tree, and only M. remanei was identified to the species level. Blasting results showed that the sequence of M. remanei (Accession number AM234620.1) had the highest similarity to the new species in the NCBI genebank. The percentage of base differences was 5.2% (82/1574). The phylogenetic tree showed the taxonomic relationships between M. parobscura sp. nov. and M. remanei (Figure 6). Thus, the phylogenetic positions of these two new species were confirmed.
Species of Molgolaimus are very similar to those of Microlaimidae, but with the reflexed ovaries. Shi et al. (2016) transferred Microlaimus pecticauda and Microlaimus spirifer from the family Microlaimidae to Molgolaimus of the family Desmodoridae [20]. Recently, Leduc et al. (2018) placed Molgolaimus demani Jensen, 1978, in the Microlaimidae [18]. In order to confirm the taxonomic position of Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov., the phylogenetic tree included members belonging to the family Desmodoridae and Microlaimidae (Figure 6). As shown in the phylogenetic tree, the family Microlaimidae and Desmodoridae exhibits two monophyletic lineages, with the larger Desmodoridae clade encompassing three subfamilies (Desmodorinae, Molgolaiminae, and Spiriniinae). Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. showed a close relationship with Molgolaimus kaikouraensis (MK446235.1) and exhibited good differentiation from species of other subfamilies. Results showed that the new species Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. clustered within the Desmodoridae clade, supporting the opinion of Lorenzen [16].

4. Conclusions

Two new species of free-living nematodes, Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov. and Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov., from mangrove wetlands in Beihai were discovered. Differentiating morphometric data were given to facilitate species identification. Nearly full-length SSU sequences of the two species were provided. ML topology performed with SSU sequences supported the taxonomic position of the two new species, and they were both assigned a firm place within the phylogeny. Sequences in this study provided a foundational basis and feasibility for future monitoring of the two nematode species by using molecular approaches such as qPCR, multiplex PCR, LF-RPA assay, and so on. It is essential for the conservation of mangrove ecosystems. But variable sequences in databases are seldom, and most of the sequences are too short or not assigned to species levels. It limits the resolving abilities of molecular tools for nematode identification. With the enrichment of the nematode DNA database, it would be particularly valuable in identifying those closely related species and contributing to a more robust nematode taxonomy.

Author Contributions

Preparation of specimens, data measurement and writing—original draft preparation, J.S.; writing—review and editing, Y.H.; funding acquisition, J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (ZR2021MD108).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Chunyan Ji for sample collection and are also grateful to Xin Zhao for providing valuable suggestions for the phylogenetic analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Naidoo, G.; Naidoo, K.; Swart, A. Oil Pollution Effects on Nematodes in Mangrove Sediment: A Microcosm Study. Res. Square 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Spedicato, A.; Zeppilli, D.; Thouzeau, G.; Michaud, E. Nematode diversity patterns in mangroves: A review of environmental drivers at different spatial scales. Biodivers. Conserv. 2023, 32, 1451–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sahraean, N.; Van Campenhout, J.; Rigaux, A.; Mosallanejad, H.; Leliaert, F.; Moens, T. Lack of population genetic structure in the marine nematodes Ptycholaimellus pandispiculatus and Terschellingia longicaudata in beaches of the Persian Gulf, Iran. Mar. Ecol. 2017, 38, e12426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xiao, Y.P.; Guo, Y.Q. Three new free-living marine nematode species of Subsphaerolaimus Lorenzen, 1978, Halichoanolaimus de Man, 1886 and Belbolla Andrássy, 1973 from mangrove wetlands in Taiwan. Zootaxa 2023, 5361, 301–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, Y.; Pang, X.P.; Guo, Y.Q. Study on marine nematodes community in Jinhai bay mangrove wetland, Beihai, Guangxi. Oceanol. Limnol. Sin. 2020, 51, 583–590. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhou, X.P.; Zeng, J.L.; Cai, L.Z.; Fu, S.J.; Tan, W.J. Two New Species of Free-Living Marine Nematodes of the Desmodoridae from Mangrove Wetlands of Xiamen Bay, China. J. Ocean Univ. China 2020, 19, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Armenteros, M.; Ruiz-Abierno, A.; Decraemer, W. Revision of Desmodorinae and Spiriniinae (Nematoda: Desmodoridae) with redescription of eight known species. Eur. J. Taxon. 2014, 96, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vincx, M. Free-Living Marine Nematodes from the Southern Bight of the North Sea. Ph.D. Thesis, State University of Ghent, Gent, Belgium, 1989; p. 678. [Google Scholar]
  9. Maria, T.F.; Smol, N.; Esteves, A.M. Two new species of Metachromadora (Nematoda: Desmodoridae) from Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and a revised dichotomous key to the genus. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. 2014, 94, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. De Ward, C.T.P. New species of Hopperia (Nematoda, Comesomatidae) and Metachromadora (Nematoda, Desmodoridae) from Patagonia, Chubut, Argentina. Zootaxa 2004, 542, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gerlach, S.A. Nematoden aus der familie der chromadoridae von den deutschen Küsten. Kiel. Meeresforsch. 1951, 8, 106–132. [Google Scholar]
  12. Timm, R.W. The marine nematodes of the Bay of Bengal. Proc. Pak. Acad. Sci. USA 1961, 1, 25–88. [Google Scholar]
  13. Furstenberg, J.P.; Vincx, M. Three new species of Chromadoropsis species (Nematoda, Desmodoridae) from Southern Africa and the North Sea. S. Afr. J. Zool. 1988, 23, 215–223. [Google Scholar]
  14. Gerlach, A.; Riemann, F. The Bremerhaven Checklist of Aquatic Nematodes. A Catalogue of Nematoda Adenophorea Excluding the Dorylaimida. Part 1; Veröff Inst Meer Bremerhaven: Bremen, Germany, 1973; Volume 4, pp. 1–736. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jensen, P. Revision of Microlaimidae, erection of Molgolaimidae fam. n., and remarks on the systematic position of Paramicrolaimus (Nematoda, Desmodorida). Zool Scr. 1978, 7, 159–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lorenzen, S. The Phylogenetic Systematics of Free Living Nematodes; The Ray Society: London, UK, 1994; p. 383. [Google Scholar]
  17. Fonseca, G.; Vanreusel, A.; Decraemer, W. Taxonomy and biogeography of Molgolaimus Ditlevsen, 1921 (Nematoda: Chromadoria) with reference to the origins of deep sea nematodes. Antarct. Sci. 2006, 18, 23–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Portnova, D. Free-living nematodes from the deep-sea Håkon Mosby Mud Volcano, including the description of two new and three known species. Zootaxa 2009, 2096, 197–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Leduc, D.; Fu, S.; Zhao, Z.Q. New nematode species from the continental slope of New Zealand (Chromadorea, Microlaimida, and Chromadorida), and unexpected placement of the genus Molgolaimus Ditlevsen, 1921. Mar. Biodiv. 2019, 49, 2267–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shi, B.; Xu, K. Spirobolbolaimus undulatus sp. nov. in intertidal sediment from the East China Sea, with transfer of two Microlaimus species to Molgolaimus (Nematoda, Desmodorida). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. 2017, 97, 1335–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Macheriotou, L.G.K.B.; Nguyen, D.T.; Phuong Nguyen, T.X.; Noppe, F.; Armenteros, M.; Boufahja, F.; Rigaux, A.; Vanreusel, A.; Derycke, S. Metabarcoding free-living marine nematodes using curated 18S and CO1 reference sequence databases for species-level taxonomic assignments. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 9, 1211–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Avó, A.P.; Daniell, T.J.; Roy, N.; Solange, O.; Jordana, B.; Helena, A. DNA barcoding and morphological identification of benthic nematodes assemblages of estuarine intertidal sediments: Advances in molecular tools for biodiversity assessment. Front. Mar. Sci. 2017, 4, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. van Megen, H.; van den Elsen, S.; Holterman, M.; Karssen, G.; Mooyman, P.; Bongers, T.; Holovachov, O.; Bakker, J.; Helder, J. A phylogenetic tree of nematodes based on about 1200 full-length small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Nematology 2009, 11, 927–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Platt, H.M.; Warwick, R.M. Free-living Marine Nematodes, Part I, British Enoplids. In Synopses of the British Fauna (New Series); The Linnean Society of London: London, UK, 1998; p. 248. [Google Scholar]
  25. De Ley, I.T.; De Ley, P.; Vierstraete, A.; Karssen, G.; Moens, M.; Vanfleteren, J. Phylogenetic analysis of Meloidogyne small subunit rDNA. J. Nematol. 2002, 34, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Stamatakis, A. RAxML Version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 1312–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Nguyen, D.T.; Gagarin, V.G.; Phan, K.L.; Nguyen TX, P.; Nguyen, V.T. Two new species of free-living marine nematodes (Nematoda) from an area near the mouth of the Yen River of Vietnam. Biol. Morya 2016, 42, 439–448. [Google Scholar]
  28. Wieser, W.; Hopper, B. Marine nematodes of the east coast of North America. I. Florida. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 1967, 135, 239–344. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gagarin, V.G.; Nguyen, V.T. Three new species of free-living marine nematodes of the order Desmodorida (Nematoda) from Vietnam. Zool. Zhurnal 2010, 89, 398–406. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gagarin, V.G.; Tu, N.D. Two new species of free living nematodes (Nematoda and Chromadorea) from mangrove thicket in Vietnam. Inland Water Biol. 2014, 7, 338–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Murphy, D.G. An initial report on a collection of Chilean marine nematodes. Mitt. Hamb. Zool. Mus. Inst. 1966, 63, 29–50. [Google Scholar]
  32. Warwick, R.M. Fourteen new species of free-living marine nematodes from the Exe estuary. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. (Zool.) 1970, 19, 137–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Muthumbi, A.W.; Vincx, M. Nematodes from the Indian Ocean: Description of six new species of the genus Molgolaimus Ditlevsen, 1921 (Nematoda: Desmodoridae). Bull. De L’institut R. Dae Sci. Nat. Belgique. Biol. 1996, 66, 17–28. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Line drawing of Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov. (A) Entire view of male, showing outer labial setae, cephalic setae, and epidermal gland cells; (B) entire view of female; (C) anterior end of holotype; (D) anterior end of holotype, showing amphid; (E) posterior end of male, showing spicule, gubernaculum, precloacal supplements, and tail protuberances; (F) magnifying spicule and gubernaculum. Scale bar: (A,B) = 50 μm; (CF) = 20 μm.
Figure 1. Line drawing of Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov. (A) Entire view of male, showing outer labial setae, cephalic setae, and epidermal gland cells; (B) entire view of female; (C) anterior end of holotype; (D) anterior end of holotype, showing amphid; (E) posterior end of male, showing spicule, gubernaculum, precloacal supplements, and tail protuberances; (F) magnifying spicule and gubernaculum. Scale bar: (A,B) = 50 μm; (CF) = 20 μm.
Jmse 12 01621 g001
Figure 2. Microphotograph of Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov. (A) Pharyngeal region of holotype, showing pharyngeal bulbs; (B) lateral ridge; (C) lateral view of holotype anterior end, showing anterior sensilla and dorsal tooth; (D) amphid of holotype; (E) posterior end of male, showing spicule and tail protuberances; (F) lateral view of male cloacal region, showing spicule, gubennaculum, and precloacal supplements. Scale bar: (A,E) = 20 μm; (C,F) = 10 μm.
Figure 2. Microphotograph of Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov. (A) Pharyngeal region of holotype, showing pharyngeal bulbs; (B) lateral ridge; (C) lateral view of holotype anterior end, showing anterior sensilla and dorsal tooth; (D) amphid of holotype; (E) posterior end of male, showing spicule and tail protuberances; (F) lateral view of male cloacal region, showing spicule, gubennaculum, and precloacal supplements. Scale bar: (A,E) = 20 μm; (C,F) = 10 μm.
Jmse 12 01621 g002
Figure 6. Phylogenetic tree generated from maximum likelihood (ML) analysis based on 18S rRNA sequences. ML bootstrap values are displayed above each branch. New species are shown in bold.
Figure 6. Phylogenetic tree generated from maximum likelihood (ML) analysis based on 18S rRNA sequences. ML bootstrap values are displayed above each branch. New species are shown in bold.
Jmse 12 01621 g006
Table 1. Measurements of individuals of Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov. (in µm except ratios).
Table 1. Measurements of individuals of Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov. (in µm except ratios).
Morphological
Characteristics
HolotypeParatype
♂1♂2♂3♂4♀1♀2
a14.014.017.315.311.712.2
b4.14.24.44.44.34.2
c11.513.214.812.515.617.7
c’2.01.92.01.72.02.2
Total body length8969771020915935976
Maximum body diameter647059608080
Head diameter222424232628
Amphideal fovea width151313151716
Amphideal fovea c.b.d.252426242724
Amphideal fovea as % of c.b.d. 605450636367
Pharynx length216233234210220232
Pharynx c.b.d.596757607175
Length of double bulb778491909592
Bulb as % of pharynx length35.636.138.942.943.040.0
Spicule length as arch68636864--
Gubernacular length31303131
Cloacal/anal body diameter393939433025
Distance from first precloacal supplement to anus5556--
Distance from last precloacal supplement to anus85101114106--
Precloacal supplement number6868--
Distance from the first protuberance to cloaca38434438--
Distance from the second protuberance to cloaca50525248--
Tail length787469736055
Vulva from anterior end----520575
Vulva c.b.d.----7780
V%----55.658.9
Table 2. Morphological differentiating data of male Metachromadora (Metachromadoroides).
Table 2. Morphological differentiating data of male Metachromadora (Metachromadoroides).
SpeciesBody
Length (µm)
Spicule
Length (µm)
Numbers of SupplementsInternal Division of Pharyngeal BulbProtuberances on the Tailabcc’References
M. complexa758–9407417tripartite28.4–11.33.4–4.47.3–12.11.3[12]
M. pulvinata17205523tripartite218.15.4 15.6 2.0[28]
M. remanei1100–130049–555bipartite*144.914 1.9–2.2[11]
M. vulgaris1100–1200720tripartite014.1–20.04.4–4.912.1–14.51.8–2.8[12]
M. zaixsi890–116040–520tripartite010.5–19.34.7–7.26.8–10.11.7–2.8 [10]
M. minor594–64135–3612–16tripartite*12–154.2–4.713.5–14.91.4–1.5[29]
M. orientalis859–113359–630bipartite**13–154.8–5.315.3–19.21.0–1.3 [30]
M. obscura786–100875–7813–14bipartite211–154.2–4.510.7–12.11.4–1.6[27]
M. xiamenensis741–88846–5618bipartite311.0–14.34.4–5.210.1–12.21.5–1.7[6]
M. parobscura sp. nov.896–102063–686–8bipartite214.0–17.34.1–4.411.5–14.81.7–2.0this study
* not described, ** described as: small protuberance with three or four setae.
Table 3. Measurements of individuals of Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. (in µm except ratios).
Table 3. Measurements of individuals of Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. (in µm except ratios).
Morphological
Characteristics
HolotypeParatype
♂1♂2♂3♂4♀1♀2♀3
a31.030.928.330.128.224.828.3
b8.07.47.78.27.97.98.2
c5.75.45.75.66.76.96.1
c’7.67.77.27.46.96.47.2
Total body length775742735752789793791
Maximum body diameter25242625283228
Head diameter6666675
Cephalic setae length2222222
Amphideal fovea width3344433
Amphideal fovea c.b.d.9899988
Amphidial fovea from anterior end6667856
Amphideal fovea as % of c.b.d.33.337.544.444.444.437.537.5
Nerve ring width14151514151615
Nerve ring c.b.d.20202120202120
Pharynx length97100969210010197
Pharynx c.b.d.22232223232522
Diameter of esophageal bulb17191818171917
Spicule length as arch33353332---
Gubernacular length11111112---
Cloacal or anal body diameter18181818171818
Cloacal/anal body diameter1.81.91.81.8---
Distance from first precloacal supplement to anus34314125---
Distance from second precloacal supplement to anus62687243---
Tail length136138130134117115129
Vulva from anterior end----348339343
Vulva c.b.d. 283026
V% 44.142.743.3
Table 4. Morphological differentiating data of male Molgolaimus (species belonging to group1b1 were listed in this Table).
Table 4. Morphological differentiating data of male Molgolaimus (species belonging to group1b1 were listed in this Table).
SpeciesBody
Length (µm)
Spicule
Length
(µm)
Numbers of Supplementsabcc’Spic/abdReferences
M. pecticauda750–850-absent23.6–30.66.6–7.27.7–10.2--[31]
M. sapiens435–62035absent19.5–24.55.4–6.88.8–10.5 2.6–3.51.9[17]
M. spirifer880–106022–25absent36.6–38.06.2–7.38.5–11.25.4–5.71.2–1.5[32]
M. drakus495–57519–20135.5–42.7 6.1–7.07.0–7.9 5.3–6.21.4–1.6[17]
M. exceptionregulum585–60028–31128.4–31.5 5.7–6.17.5–8.9 3.6–4.61.6–1.8[17]
M. mareprofundus610–63029–32124.1–30.7 5.8–6.77.2–7.64.6–5.11.6–1.9[17]
M. gazii382–43029227.55.66.0–6.1-2.2–2.9[33]
M. longicaudatus sp. nov.735–77532–35228.3–31.07.4–8.25.4–5.77.2–7.71.8–1.9This study
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, J.; Huang, Y. Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov. and Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. (Nematoda, Desmodoridae) from Mangrove Wetlands of China. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 1621. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12091621

AMA Style

Sun J, Huang Y. Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov. and Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. (Nematoda, Desmodoridae) from Mangrove Wetlands of China. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2024; 12(9):1621. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12091621

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Jing, and Yong Huang. 2024. "Metachromadora parobscura sp. nov. and Molgolaimus longicaudatus sp. nov. (Nematoda, Desmodoridae) from Mangrove Wetlands of China" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 12, no. 9: 1621. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12091621

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop