Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cigniti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Happy to userfy content if anyone can demonstrate notability and wants to try and improve the article. Olaf Davis (talk) 17:47, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cigniti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable software company. The references are either press releases or disguised press releases, or routing business listings, none of which show notability DGG ( talk ) 15:43, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete without objection to an article being created that clearly shows that this company meets Wikipedia's notability requirements, and no objection to temporary userfication or draft-ification at the request of an established editor who declares an intent to write a proper article. Of course, if this company does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines, then doing so will, by definition, be impossible. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 02:54, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable company. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:44, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Notability meeting WP:ORG not demonstrated or claimed. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 02:03, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.