The Economic Times daily newspaper is available online now.

    Boeing offered 737 MAX plea deal, lawyer of crash victims' families says

    Synopsis

    The US Justice Department has offered Boeing a plea deal to avoid trial over the two deadly 737 MAX crashes, causing outrage among victims' families. The deal reportedly includes a fine and oversight by an external supervisor. Families, represented by lawyer Paul Cassell, strongly oppose the agreement and are prepared to contest it in court if Boeing accepts. Boeing, contacted by AFP, declined to comment. The DOJ previously considered prosecuting Boeing for violating a prior deferred prosecution agreement related to the crashes that claimed 346 lives.

    An engine cover on a Southwest Airlines plane rips off, forcing the flight to return to DenverAP
    An airplane flies over a sign on Boeing's 737 delivery center
    The US Justice Department is offering Boeing a plea deal that will allow it to avoid a trial related to two deadly 737 MAX crashes, a lawyer for the victims' families said Sunday, expressing outrage.

    Details of the deal, which requires Boeing to pay a fine and submit to an outside supervisor, were given to the families in a two-hour presentation by the Department of Justice (DOJ) on Sunday, said Paul Cassell, a University of Utah law professor who represents the families.

    He said the families "will strenuously object" to the agreement, if Boeing ultimately accepts and it is presented to a judge.

    Contacted by AFP, Boeing declined to comment.

    The New York Times reported over a week ago that prosecutors were eying such an alternative settlement, known as a deferred prosecution agreement, or DPA, but the DOJ said it had not yet made a decision.

    In May, the DOJ concluded that Boeing could be prosecuted for violating a previous DPA reached following the two fatal 737 MAX crashes in 2018 and 2019, which claimed 346 lives.

    Under that three-year deal, Boeing agreed to pay $2.5 billion to settle fraud charges related to the certification of the 737 MAX.

    But the aviation giant came under renewed scrutiny early this year after a 737 MAX operated by Alaska Airlines was forced to make an emergency landing after a fuselage panel blew out mid-flight.

    The January 5 incident brought Boeing's manufacturing processes back into the spotlight, prompting regulator scrutiny and congressional investigations.

    Meanwhile, the victims' families have repeatedly urged federal prosecutors to bring Boeing to court versus reaching another settlement.

    But prosecutors also faced pressure not to further damage Boeing, a company seen as critical to the US aviation industry as well as national security.

    In his presentation on Sunday, the lead US prosecutor "admitted there is 'a strong interest' by the families to go to trial, but he repeatedly said that the DOJ couldn't prove charges by a reasonable doubt," Cassell said.

    "Families argued over and over for a trial and to allow a jury to make that decision," he said.

    Boeing contested the DOJ's conclusions in mid-June, but has recognized the gravity of the safety crisis.

    CEO Dave Calhoun, who has agreed to step down later in the year, told a recent congressional hearing that the company is "taking action and making progress."

    Ultimately, it will be up to the federal judge in Texas who is overseeing the case to decide if the new DPA goes through.


    (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)

    (Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, Budget 2024 Events and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)

    Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online.

    ...more

    (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel)

    (Catch all the Business News, Breaking News, Budget 2024 Events and Latest News Updates on The Economic Times.)

    Subscribe to The Economic Times Prime and read the ET ePaper online.

    ...more
    The Economic Times

    Stories you might be interested in