This story is from November 1, 2023

TISS student rusticated over social media post gets HC relief

The Bombay High Court has directed the reconstituted appellate authority of Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) to make a decision on an appeal by a student who was rusticated for a social media post allegedly made by her husband. The court emphasized that while discipline is important, the institution should also show magnanimity towards its students. The judges also noted that TISS had constituted an appellate committee with the same members who had passed the original order, which was deemed inappropriate. The court ordered the authority to be reconstituted within a week and make a fair decision.
TISS student rusticated over social media post gets HC relief
Tata Institute of Social Sciences
MUMBAI: Bombay high court has directed the reconstituted appellate authority of Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS) to take a decision on an appeal by a student against her rustication for a social media post allegedly by her husband against two faculty members.
“Without intending to influence the appellate authority, we do observe that while the need to maintain discipline is acknowledged, the respondent-institution should also show magnanimity commensurate to its status to its students and should not only focus on imposing punishments or retribution...,” said Justices Nitin Jamdar and Manjusha Deshpande in the October 18 order.The petition was filed by a doctor who was pursuing a hospital management course. She had alleged sexual harassment by a faculty member. On October 8, 2022, two faculty members complained regarding a social media post allegedly circulated by her husband. TISS constituted a three-member committee to conduct an inquiry. The committee recommended her rustication. In December 2022, her appeal was dismissed.
The judges noted that TISS had constituted an appellate committee of the same members who had passed the original order. “This obviously could not have been done,’’ they said. TISS’ advocate Shanay Shah said it will constitute a fresh appellate authority. The student’s advocate Gauri Raghuwanshi said she is seeking employment and is in need of a degree.
The judges directed the appellate authority to be reconstituted within a week. It will “consider all aspects and take an appropriate decision.” They said those faculty members who seem to be more aggrieved would have their personal remedies in law.
“The petitioner now seeks only a degree. Therefore we have no doubt that the appellate authority will take a dispassionate view as an institution to find a solution to put a quietus to the issue, leaving it to those feeling defamed to pursue their own remedies, if so inclined,’’ they concluded.
We also published the following articles recently

Hindu College rusticates 15
Around 15 students at Delhi University's Hindu College have been rusticated for "indiscipline" during the college union elections. The students were charged with disruptions during the elections and have been rusticated for a finite period based on their level of involvement. The rusticated students have been asked to submit an undertaking stating they will not engage in such activities in the future. The students had staged a hunger strike in protest against the rejection of student nominations for key positions in the college union.
Delhi University student alleges rape by her date
A 19-year-old Delhi University student has lodged a complaint alleging sexual assault by her date in Gulabi Bagh. The woman claimed that she met the suspect through the Bumble app and agreed to meet him at a tea stall. However, he convinced her to go to his house, where he allegedly assaulted her. The police are currently trying to locate and apprehend the suspect. The victim's identity has not been disclosed to protect her privacy.
Merely liking obscene social media post not an offence: Allahabad HC
The Allahabad High Court in India has ruled that liking an obscene post on Facebook or any other social media platform does not constitute an offense. However, sharing or retweeting such a post would be considered "transmission" and would be a violation of the Information Technology Act. The court made this decision in response to a petition filed by Mohd Imran Kazi, who had been charged under the IT Act and the Indian Penal Code for liking a post that allegedly incited unlawful assembly. The court stated that liking a post does not amount to publishing or transmitting it.
author
About the Author
Rosy Sequeira

Rosy Sequeira is special correspondent at The TImes of India, Mumbai\nsince July 2011. She has covered Bombay High Court for over nine years\nwhich includes her earlier stints with other newspapers. Her forte is\non-the-spot accurate reporting. She tries to bring a human face to the otherwise largely\ndrab court proceedings and constantly looks out for judicial observations \nthat strike a chord with the common man.\n

End of Article
FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA